In this study feature Selection technique (FST) namely Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is used to optimize the features of diabetes datasets. There are different types of classifiers that give low performances. So we need an FST to combined classifier may be required for best results. We used FST to improve the overall performance of the classification model. Classification of diabetes dataset classifier C4.5 and Support Vector Machine (SVM) is applied. The selected feature of diabetes is applied to classifiers and a comparative study was conducted. The experimental outcome reveals that the C4.5 is performed better with selected features compared to other models.

Classification, C4.5, feature Selection technique, Particle Swarm Optimization, Support Vector Machine

[1] S. K. Sahu and P. K. Chandrakar, “Classification of Chronic Kidney Disease with Genetic Search Intersection Based Feature,” in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 1122, vol. 1, pp. 11–21, 2020.
[2] S. M. Alzahani, A. Althopity, A. Alghamdi, B. Alshehri, and S. Aljuaid, “An Overview of Data Mining Techniques Applied for Heart Disease Diagnosis and Prediction,” Eng. Technol. Publ., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 310–315, 2014.
[3] B. O. Eriksen and O. C. Ingebretsen, “In chronic kidney disease staging the use of the chronicity criterion affects prognosis and the rate of progression,” Kidney Int., vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 1242–1248, 2007.
[4] A. M. Altamimi, “Performance Analysis of Supervised Classifying Algorithms to Predict Diabetes in Children,” J. Xi’an Univ. Archit. Technol., vol. XII, no. III, pp. 2010–2017, 2020.
[5] G. A. Pethunachiyar, “Classification of diabetes patients using kernel based support vector machines,” in 2020 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics, ICCCI 2020, pp. 22–25, 2020.
[6] H. Kaur and G. Kaur, “Prediction of Diabetes Using Support Vector Machine,” Int. J. Res. Eng. Appl. Manag., vol. 05, no. 02, pp. 470–473, 2019.
[7] A. Kumari and R. Chitra, “Classification Of Diabetes Disease Using Support Vector Machine,” Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1797–1801, 2013.
[8] O. S.Soliman and E. AboElhamd, “Classification of Diabetes Mellitus using Modified Particle Swarm Optimization and Least Squares Support Vector Machine,” Int. J. Comput. Trends Technol., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 38–44, 2014.
[9] S. Sathyanarayana and S. Amarappa, “Data classification using Support vector Machine (SVM), a simplified approaCH,” Int. J. Electron. Comput. S cience Eng. Vol. 3, Number 4, ISSN- 2277-1956, pp. 435–445, 2014.
[10] J. R. Quinlan, “Improved Use of Continuous Attributes in C4 . 5,” vol. 4, no. 1996, pp. 77–90, 2006.
[11] A. K. Shrivas and S. K. Sahu, “Classification of Chronic Kidney Disease using Combination Feature Selection Techniques and Classifiers,” vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 114–117, 2019.
[12] N. Boodhun and M. Jayabalan, “Risk prediction in life insurance industry using supervised learning algorithms,” Complex Intell. Syst., no. March, 2018.
[13] M. Dash and H. Liu, “Feature selection for classification,” Intell. Data Anal., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 131–156, 1997.
[14] P. Verma, V. K. Awasthi, and S. K. Sahu, “An Ensemble Model With Genetic Algorithm for Classification of Coronary Artery Disease,” Int. J. Comput. Vis. Image Process., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 70–83, 2021.
[15] L. Bianchi, M. Dorigo, L. Maria, and W. J. Gutjahr, “A survey on metaheuristics for stochastic combinatorial optimization,” pp. 239–287, 2009.
[16] J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, “Particle Swarm Optimization,” pp. 1942–1948, 1995.
[17] Y. Shi and R. Eberhart, “A Modified Particle Swarm Optimizer,” pp. 69–73, 1998.