Open Access   Article Go Back

Use of Software Metrics on Software Development Projects Life Cycles in OOE to Improve Software Quality

Piyush Prakash1 , Sarvottam Dixit2 , S. Srinivasan3

Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Journal Paper
Volume-7 , Issue-5 , Page no. 1858-1864, May-2019

CrossRef-DOI:   https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v7i5.18581864

Online published on May 31, 2019

Copyright © Piyush Prakash, Sarvottam Dixit, S. Srinivasan . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

View this paper at   Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library

How to Cite this Paper

  • IEEE Citation
  • MLA Citation
  • APA Citation
  • BibTex Citation
  • RIS Citation

IEEE Style Citation: Piyush Prakash, Sarvottam Dixit, S. Srinivasan, “Use of Software Metrics on Software Development Projects Life Cycles in OOE to Improve Software Quality,” International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Vol.7, Issue.5, pp.1858-1864, 2019.

MLA Style Citation: Piyush Prakash, Sarvottam Dixit, S. Srinivasan "Use of Software Metrics on Software Development Projects Life Cycles in OOE to Improve Software Quality." International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering 7.5 (2019): 1858-1864.

APA Style Citation: Piyush Prakash, Sarvottam Dixit, S. Srinivasan, (2019). Use of Software Metrics on Software Development Projects Life Cycles in OOE to Improve Software Quality. International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, 7(5), 1858-1864.

BibTex Style Citation:
@article{Prakash_2019,
author = {Piyush Prakash, Sarvottam Dixit, S. Srinivasan},
title = {Use of Software Metrics on Software Development Projects Life Cycles in OOE to Improve Software Quality},
journal = {International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering},
issue_date = {5 2019},
volume = {7},
Issue = {5},
month = {5},
year = {2019},
issn = {2347-2693},
pages = {1858-1864},
url = {https://www.ijcseonline.org/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=4495},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v7i5.18581864}
publisher = {IJCSE, Indore, INDIA},
}

RIS Style Citation:
TY - JOUR
DO = {https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v7i5.18581864}
UR - https://www.ijcseonline.org/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=4495
TI - Use of Software Metrics on Software Development Projects Life Cycles in OOE to Improve Software Quality
T2 - International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering
AU - Piyush Prakash, Sarvottam Dixit, S. Srinivasan
PY - 2019
DA - 2019/05/31
PB - IJCSE, Indore, INDIA
SP - 1858-1864
IS - 5
VL - 7
SN - 2347-2693
ER -

VIEWS PDF XML
401 294 downloads 172 downloads
  
  
           

Abstract

Software quality metrics are part of software metrics focusing primarily on process, product and project quality aspects. Software quality metrics primarily focus on software measurement and its development process. The main objective of software testing is to enhance the quality of software. Many experts in the field of software testing propose various number of metrics. With the help of these we can detect trends and can prevent problems in efficient cost control, quality improvements, time and risk reduction with their probable solutions. Thus, in the global competitive market, it facilitates ensuring and achieving optimal business goals.

Key-Words / Index Term

Software Testing, Software Testing Metrics, Software Testing Product Metrics, Software Testing Process Metrics

References

[1] Aggarwal, K.K., Singh, Y., Kaur, A., and Maihotra, R. (2005), ‘Software Reuse Metrics for Object-Oriented Systems’ , Proceedings of the 2005 Third ACIS Int’l Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA ‘05).
[2] Arar, O. F. and Ayan, K. (2016). Deriving thresholds of ¨ software metrics to predict faults on open source software: Replicated case studies. Expert Systems with Applications, 61:106–121.
[3] DeMarco, T. (2013), ‘Controlling Software Projects: Management, Measurement and Estimation.’ ISBN 0-13-171711-1.
[4] Dhavachelvan,P., V.S.K. Uma, Venkatachalapathy G. V. (2006) ‘A new approach in development of distributed framework for automated software testing using agents’ , Volume 19, Issue 4.
[5] Erturk, E. and Sezer, E. A. (2015). A comparison of some soft computing methods for software fault prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(4):1872–1879.
[6] Ghotra, B., McIntosh, S., and Hassan, A. E. (2015). Revisiting the impact of classification techniques on the performance of defect prediction models. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Software Engineering-Volume 1, pages 789–800. IEEE Press.
[7] Honglei, T., Wei, S., and Yanan, Z. (2009). The research on software metrics and software complexity metrics. In Computer Science-Technology and Applications, 2009. IFCSTA’09. International Forum on, volume 1, pages 131–136. IEEE.
[8] Kamei, Y. and Shihab, E. (2016). Defect prediction: Accomplishments and future challenges. In Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER), 2016 IEEE 23rd International Conference on, volume 5, pages 33–45. IEEE
[9] Karner, C. and Bond, W.P. (2004), ‘Software Engineer Metrics: What do they measure and how do we know?’ Proceeding of the 10th International Software Metrics Symposium, Metrics.
[10] Kumar, L., Misra, S., and Rath, S. K. (2017). An empirical analysis of the effectiveness of software metrics and fault prediction model for identifying faulty classes. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 53:1–32.
[11] Menzies, T., Krishna, R., and Pryor, D. (2015). The promise repository of empirical software engineering data (2015).
[12] Ogasawara, H., Yamada, A. and Kojo, M. (1996) ‘Experiences of software Quality Management Using Metrics through Life cycle’, Proceedings of ICSE.
[13] Paul, C. (2002) ‘Software Testing - A Craftsman’s Approach Second Edition’ CRC Press.
[14] Prakash, P. (2018). ‘Using weighted defects metrics to improve software quality: An analysis and review’. International conference on recent trends and advances in computer science and engineering, LIET, Alwar, Rajasthan, India, 14-15 April, 2018, pages 50-53.
[15] Rathore, S. S. and Kumar, S. (2017). Linear and non-linear heterogeneous ensemble methods to predict the number of faults in software systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 119:232–256.
[16] Turhan, B., Mısırlı, A. T., and Bener, A. (2013). Empirical evaluation of the effects of mixed project data on learning defect predictors. Information and Software Technology, 55(6):1101–1118.
[17] Yang, X., Lo, D., Xia, X., and Sun, J. (2017). Tlel: A two layer ensemble learning approach for just-in-time defect prediction. Information and Software Technology, 87:206–220.
[18] Zhao, Y., Yang, Y., Lu, H., Liu, J., Leung, H., Wu, Y., Zhou, Y., and Xu, B. (2017). Understanding the value of considering client usage context in package cohesion for fault-proneness prediction. Automated Software Engineering, 24(2):393–453.
[19] Aanchal, Kumar S. (2013). ‘Metrics for Software Components in Object Oriented Environments: A Survey’ International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science and Engineering, Volume-1, Issue-2, March-April-2013: pp. 25-29.