A Comparative Study of Software Metrics for Analysis and Its Impact on Predictability
G.Yamini 1 , Gopinath Ganapathy2
Section:Research Paper, Product Type: Journal Paper
Volume-7 ,
Issue-1 , Page no. 134-138, Jan-2019
CrossRef-DOI: https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v7i1.134138
Online published on Jan 31, 2019
Copyright © G.Yamini, Gopinath Ganapathy . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
View this paper at Google Scholar | DPI Digital Library
How to Cite this Paper
- IEEE Citation
- MLA Citation
- APA Citation
- BibTex Citation
- RIS Citation
IEEE Style Citation: G.Yamini, Gopinath Ganapathy, “A Comparative Study of Software Metrics for Analysis and Its Impact on Predictability,” International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Vol.7, Issue.1, pp.134-138, 2019.
MLA Style Citation: G.Yamini, Gopinath Ganapathy "A Comparative Study of Software Metrics for Analysis and Its Impact on Predictability." International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering 7.1 (2019): 134-138.
APA Style Citation: G.Yamini, Gopinath Ganapathy, (2019). A Comparative Study of Software Metrics for Analysis and Its Impact on Predictability. International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, 7(1), 134-138.
BibTex Style Citation:
@article{Ganapathy_2019,
author = {G.Yamini, Gopinath Ganapathy},
title = {A Comparative Study of Software Metrics for Analysis and Its Impact on Predictability},
journal = {International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering},
issue_date = {1 2019},
volume = {7},
Issue = {1},
month = {1},
year = {2019},
issn = {2347-2693},
pages = {134-138},
url = {https://www.ijcseonline.org/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=3474},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v7i1.134138}
publisher = {IJCSE, Indore, INDIA},
}
RIS Style Citation:
TY - JOUR
DO = {https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v7i1.134138}
UR - https://www.ijcseonline.org/full_paper_view.php?paper_id=3474
TI - A Comparative Study of Software Metrics for Analysis and Its Impact on Predictability
T2 - International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering
AU - G.Yamini, Gopinath Ganapathy
PY - 2019
DA - 2019/01/31
PB - IJCSE, Indore, INDIA
SP - 134-138
IS - 1
VL - 7
SN - 2347-2693
ER -
VIEWS | XML | |
489 | 322 downloads | 208 downloads |
Abstract
Quality assurance is one of the important non-functional software requirements which many software products fail to satisfy. Current software market is driven mostly by urgency and competition. One of the methods to ensure software quality is a metrics-based approach. Software metrics have been used to quantitatively evaluate software products. Software metrics play an important role in developing high quality software as well as to improve the developer’s productivity. Metrics can help quantify previous work in a way that can directly guide future efforts. For example, projects of different sizes can require vastly different levels of effort, organizational structure, and management discipline. There is an increasing need for metrics adapted to the Object-Oriented (OO) paradigm to help manage and foster quality in software development. Object-oriented design patterns are an emergent technology: they are reusable micro-architectures, high level building blocks. A major benefit of object-oriented software development is the support for reuse provided by object-oriented and object-based languages. The usefulness of metrics is reviewed. The reliability is one of the most important attributes of software quality. The presumed objective of the estimation of the reliability consists in the analysis of the risk and of the reliability of the software-based systems. This paper presents the study of different suite in object-oriented (OO) design metric.
Key-Words / Index Term
Software metrics; Object-oriented; MOOD; CK metric
References
[1] W. Li and S. Henry, “ Maintenance Metrics for the Object-Oriented Paradigm”, In Proceedings of the First International Software Metrics Symposium, Baltimore Maryland, pp. 52-60, 1993.
[2] L. Etzkorn, J. Bansiya, C. Davis, “Design and Code Complexity Metrics for OO Classes”, Journal of Object- Oriented Programming, pp. 35-40, 1999.
[3] K. K. Aggarwal, Y. Singh, A. Kaur, R. Malhotra, “Software Reuse Metrics for Object - Oriented Systems”, In Proceedings of ACIS Third International conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications, 2005.
[4] P. Gandhi, P. K. Bhatia, “Reusability Metrics for Object - Oriented System: An Alternative Approach”, International Journal of Software Engineering (IJSE), Vol. 1, No 4, pp. 63 – 72, 2010.
[5] Taylor, D. (1992): Object-Oriented Information Systems: Planning and Implementation. New York, US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[6] W. Frakes and C. Terry, “Reuse Level Metrics”, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Software Reuse: Advances in Software Reusability, IEEE, 1994.
[7] J. Guo, Luqui, “A Survey of Software Reuse Repositories”, 7th IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems, pp. 92-100, 2000.
[8] Kaur, S. Singh and K. S. Kahlon, “Evaluation and Metrication of Object Oriented System”, Proceedings of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2009, I IMECS 2009, Hong Kong, 2009.
[9] Dr B.R. Sastry, M.V. Vijaya Saradhi, “Impact of software metrics on Object Oriented Software Development life cycle”, International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 2, pg 67-76, 2010.
[10] Y. Singh, A. Kaur, R. Malhotra, “Software fault proneness prediction using support vector machines”, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 1–3, 2009.
[11] G.J. Pai, J.B. Dugan, “Empirical analysis of software fault content and fault proneness using Bayesian methods”, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 33 pp. 675–686, 2007.
[12] H.M. Olague, L.H. Etzkorn, S. Gholston, S. Quattlebaum, “Empirical validation of three software metrics suites to predict fault-proneness of object-oriented classes developed using highly iterative or agile software development processes”, IEEE Trans. Software. Vol. 33, pp. 402–419.2007.
[13] Y. Zhou, H. Leung, “Empirical analysis of object-oriented design metrics for predicting high and low severity faults”, IEEE Transactions on software engineering, Vol. 32, pp. 771–789, 2006.
[14] R. Subramanyam and M.S. Krishnan, “Empirical Analysis of CK metrics for Object Oriented Design Complexity: Implications of Software defects”, IEEE transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2003.
[15] S.R.Chidamber and C.F.Kemerer. “A metrics suite for object oriented design”. IEEE Transactions on Software Engieneering, pp. 476 – 493, 1994.