A Survey on Face Recognition Based Attendance System and Its Techniques
Survey Paper | Journal Paper
Vol.7 , Issue.12 , pp.128-131, Dec-2019
CrossRef-DOI: https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v7i12.128131
Abstract
Face recognition is a rising and important research area for many years. Numerous motives raised from the automatic recognitions and surveillance structures, the need for the human visual device on face reputation, and the modeling of human-computer interface, and so on. Those researches involve understanding and researchers from disciplines like neuroscience, psychology, pc vision, pattern recognition, picture processing, and system gaining knowledge of, etc. A set of researchers came into life to type out the specific elements like illumination, expression, scale, pose, and advantage the first-class popularity charge, when there is nevertheless no strong method against out of control realistic cases which may additionally contain types of elements. A facial recognition system is a computer application that has the capability of locating a person from a digital image or a video body from a video source. The most important part of spotting someone is his or her face. With the help of photograph processing strategies, we can explore the traits appearances of someone. In the old approach that is utilized in colleges and faculties, it`s far there that the professor calls the student call and then the attendance for the scholars marked. For the images which are stored inside the database, we follow a machine set of rules which incorporates steps consisting of, histogram classification, noise elimination, face detection, and face recognition techniques. So by utilizing those steps, we come across the faces after which examine it with the database. The attendance gets marked automatically if the machine recognizes the faces. This paper presents a comparative examine of several strategies of face reputation systems.
Key-Words / Index Term
face recognition, person identification, bio-metrics
References
[1] T.Kanade, M.Haaao "Edge and Line Extraction in Pattern Recognition", FMC. Inst. neet. Corn. -8. Japan, V01.55, No.12, pp.1618-1627, Dec. 1972
[2] L. Sirovich and M. Kirby. Low-dimensional procedure for the characterization of human faces. Journal of the Optical Society of America A - Optics, Image Science and Vision, 4(3):519–524, March 1987.
[3] T. J. Stonham. Practical face recognition and verification with wisard. In H. D. Ellis, editor, Aspects of face processing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1986
[4] Chellappa, R., Wilson, C., Sirohey, S., 1995. Human and machine recognition of faces: A survey. Proceedings of the IEEE 83, 705–740.
[5] M. Turk and A. Pentland. Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3(1):71– 86, 1991.
[6] R. Diamond and S. Carey. Why faces are and are not special. An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115(2):107– 117, 1986.
[7] A. Nefian and M. Hayes. Hidden Markov models for face recognition. In Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP`98, volume 5, pages 2721–2724, Washington, USA, May 1998.
[8] 8.M.Kelly Edge detection by computer using Planning," in Machine Intelligence VI, Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh, 1971, pp. 397-409.
[9] Sakai, T. 1969. Two new genera and twenty-two new species of crabs from Japan. Proc. BioI. Soc. Washington 82: 243-280.
[10] P. Belhumeur, J. Hespanha, and D. Kriegman. Eigenfaces vs. fisher face Recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19(7):711–720, July 1997.
[11] P. Jonathon Phillips “Support Vector Machines Applied to Face Recognition” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp 803-809, 1999.
[12] G. Guo, S. Li, and K. Chan. Face recognition by support vector machines. In Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, pages 196–201, Grenoble, France, March 2000.
[13] Herbert Bay, Andreas Ess, Tinne Tuytelaars and Luc Van Gool "Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF)" Elsevier Computer Vision and Image Understanding, Vol 110, pp 346-359, 2008.
[14] Hajer Fradi, Jean-Luc Dugelay "A New Multiclass SVM Algorithm And Its Application To Crowd Density Analysis Using Lbp Features"
[15] Ahmed Boudissa, Joo Kooi Tan, Hyoungseop Kim, Seiji Ishikawa “A simple pedestrian detection using LBP-based patterns of oriented edges”
[16] Zhengrong, Yule, Ross Hayward, Rodney Walker "Color And Texture Feature Fusion Using Kernel Pca With Application To Object-Based Vegetation Species Classification"
[17] Liu, Paul Fieguth, Guoying Zhao and Matti Pietik "Extended Local Binary Pattern Fusion For Face Recognition"
[18] Cong Wang, Zhenhua Chai, Zhenan Sun “Face Recognition Using Histogram Of Co-Occurrence Gabor Phase Patterns”
[19] Won-Jae Park, Dae-Hwan Kim, Suryanto “Fast Human Detection Using Selective Block-Based HogLbp”
[20] Cuicui Kang, Shengcai Liao ”Kernel Sparse Representation With Local Patterns For Face Recognition”
Citation
Pravin Panditrao Chilme, Pathan Naserkhan Jaffarkhan, "A Survey on Face Recognition Based Attendance System and Its Techniques," International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Vol.7, Issue.12, pp.128-131, 2019.
A Survey on TAXO Finder: An Efficient Taxonomy Learning Using Graph Based Approach
Survey Paper | Journal Paper
Vol.7 , Issue.12 , pp.132-134, Dec-2019
CrossRef-DOI: https://doi.org/10.26438/ijcse/v7i12.132134
Abstract
Taxonomy learning knowledge is an essential project for knowledge acquisition, sharing, and classification in addition to utility development and usage in diverse domains. To decrease human effort to build a taxonomy from scratch and enhance the quality of discovered taxonomy, we endorse a brand new taxonomy gaining knowledge of method, named taxo finder. Taxofinder takes 3 steps to mechanically build a taxonomy. First, it identifies domain-specific standards from a website textual content corpus. 2nd, it builds a graph representing how such standards are related collectively primarily based on their co-occurrences. As the key approach in taxofinder, the taxonomy may be built manually however it`s far a complex manner when the information is so huge and it additionally produces some errors while taxonomy production. There may be diverse automated taxonomy creation techniques that are used to study taxonomy based totally on key-word terms, text corpus and from domain particular principles and so on. So it`s far required to construct taxonomy with less human effort and with much less error price. This paper affords certain records about those techniques.
Key-Words / Index Term
Taxonomy learning, knowledge searching, TaxoFinder, keyword phrases
References
[1] S. Porna Sai, S. Udhaya, R. Suganya, K.S. Sangeetha. Supporting Privacy Protection in Personalized Web Search - A Survey. Indian Journal of Innovations and Developments. 2014, 3(3), 45-49.
[2] F. Fallucchi, F. M. Zanzotto. Inductive probabilistic taxonomy learning using singular value decomposition. Natural Language Engineering. 2011, 17(01), 71-94.
[3] Z. Kozareva, E. A. Hovy. semi-supervised method to learn and construct taxonomies using the web. In Proceedings of the 2010 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. Association for Computational Linguistics. 2010, 1110-1118.
[4] M. S. Paukkeri, A. P. García-Plaza, S. Pessala, T. Honkela. Learning taxonomic relations from a set of text documents. In Computer Science and Information Technology (IMCSIT), Proceedings of the 2010 International Multiconference. 2010, 105-112.
[5] W. Wang, P. M.Barnaghi, A. Bargiela. Probabilistic topic models for learning terminological ontologies. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 2010, 22(7), 1028-1040.
[6] I. Novalija, D. Mladenić, L. Bradeško. OntoPlus: Text-driven ontology extension using ontology content, structure, and co-occurrence information. Knowledge-Based Systems. 2011, 24(8), 1261-1276
[7] S. P. Ponzetto, M. Strube. Taxonomy induction based on a collaboratively built knowledge repository. Artificial Intelligence. 2011, 175(9-10), 1737-1756.
[8] E. A. Dietz, D. Vandic, F. Frasincar. Taxolearn: A semantic approach to domain taxonomy learning. In Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT). 2012; 1, 58-65.
[9] T. Fountain, M. Lapata. Taxonomy induction using hierarchical random graphs. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies.2012, 466-476.
[10] X. Liu, Y. Song, S. Liu, H. Wang. Automatic taxonomy construction from keywords. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 2012, 1433-1441.
[11] H. Yang. Constructing task-specific taxonomies for document collection browsing. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning. 2012; 1278-1289.
[12] J. De Knijff, F. Frasincar, F. Hogenboom. Domain taxonomy learning from text: The subsumption method versus hierarchical clustering. Data & Knowledge Engineering 2013; 83, 54-69.
Citation
Abhijeet Ashokrao Kadam, Shivputra Guruling Swami, "A Survey on TAXO Finder: An Efficient Taxonomy Learning Using Graph Based Approach," International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Vol.7, Issue.12, pp.132-134, 2019.